The Near-Medical Grade MBTI Test For Those Who Already Know They're Intuitive
The Near-Medical Grade MBTI Test For Those Who Already Know They're Intuitive
Over 1000 hours of work and research went into making this MBTI personality test the most rigorous and precise on the web. It is intended for those who have already taken another MBTI test to have their major N v. S preference identified and came out iNtuitive.
"Intuition is sometimes described as a “sixth sense.” Unlike logical or deductive methods, it is a means of knowing without being able to explain exactly how one arrived at that point of understanding. Hence, the “how” of intuition is in many ways
Over 1000 hours of work and research went into making this MBTI personality test the most rigorous and precise on the web. It is intended for those who have already taken another MBTI test to have their major N v. S preference identified and came out iNtuitive.
"Intuition is sometimes described as a “sixth sense.” Unlike logical or deductive methods, it is a means of knowing without being able to explain exactly how one arrived at that point of understanding. Hence, the “how” of intuition is in many ways
When it comes to conceptual frameworks, you tend to form ones which are static and final rather than fluid and open.
Do you tend to gather ideas from "without" (I.e. From new books, new movies, fresh conversation, and on the periphery of your mind's eye) or do you seem to gather ideas from a deep well within yourself (I.e. From the residue of previous impressions and thoughts, stirring in a very consciously aware stew)?
When figuring out a brand new idea, do you tend to stay inwardly "open" and allow your mind to mull over it naturally, loosely, and calmly? Or do you feel a strong nagging, (though this can be an enjoyable and "addictive" force) to figure out the idea as soon as possible? Even perhaps as a kind of attack against some outward competition/pressure?
Is your logic more inductive or deductive? (Ind = general to specific. Ded = specific to general)
Do you tend to care more about logical progression (being able to explain every step, every step being important) or result/outcome (possibly, "I trust the method I used")?
Is your love for people more intensive or extensive?
Put another way, respectively, is your affection aimed at who the person is as a person, I.e. "deep down" or who the person is "in spirit", I.e. Does your love naturally overlook/work to excuse those common human defects?
If you were being honest with yourself, would you say that (even deep down and often overcome) your feelings are like an internal structure that inform your worldview at large? Or would you rather say that your feelings are abstract and "found" in the world (I.e. In reaction to it)?
This is gonna be weird for all of us intuitives...
Look inside of your sensual experience. Is it composed more of sight, sound, touch, smell, taste or rather more like pain, hunger, numbness, tingling? (Keep in mind that both accounts are unconscious for us and thus ought to be perceived using your perceiving functions rather than judging ones.)
Notice how you pay attention to the world of sensation. Do you seem to be living in a concrete world or a world which is somewhat fluid and odd?
Is the focus of your mind's eye primarily on the internal world of possibilities or the external world of possibilities?
Do you feel most like yourself when you're with people or alone?
Is emotion an unconscious process that sometimes takes control or is it a conscious process that is sometimes overcome by cold logic?
INTP
INTP
ENTP
ENTP
INFP
INFP
ENFP
ENFP
INFJ
INFJ
ENFJ
ENFJ
INTJ
INTJ
ENTJ
ENTJ